Foggy border

naeem19

If the discredit towards polls and electoral barometers is as deep-rooted and widespread as it is, why continue doing them? Why do you pay to do them? Why do those who consume them “buy” them? There is no need to give it much thought: because they serve what they serve, which is mainly for two things, both inseparably linked. To attract attention by fabricating news - with its consequent conversion into merchandise - and to enter directly into the electoral confrontation, influencing its results. According to the latest Pre-Election Survey of Catalonia that has just been made public by the , of those consulted have not seen fit to express which party they will vote for. Tenuous is the line that currently separates the virtual from the real, the true from the 'fake', even though when entering from.

That misty border into each of these two fields and advancing towards their respective limits, the distance allows us to distinguish more easily lie versus truth or fictitious invention versus reality. Of Belgium Mobile Number List course, truth and reality - different no matter how much we try to confuse them as if they were oneare boundaries that we can never fully reach. According to the latest Pre-Election Survey of Catalonia that has just been made public by the, of those consulted have not seen fit to express which party they will vote for. This percentage in one of the four provinces - Girona - reaches 61.2%. This majority group is made up of those who say they do not know - yet - who to vote for for those who do not answer.



For those who say they will not vote and for those who will do so blankly  Said the same thing but in a different way: only 42.8% of those consulted have expressed their specific intention to vote. In previous pre-election surveys in Catalonia (2015 and 2017), this last percentage rose to  and ; both already quite close to the percentages of effective participation registered later at the polls. With a census of 5.6 million voters, there are therefore more than million of whom, on this occasion, based on the responses of those consulted in the CIS Survey, it is not possible to predict - even by approximation - what party they will vote for or even if they will vote for any. On the other hand, according to this latest Survey, of those who voted that year remember having voted for the PSC in 2017 (on the “virtual census” of the Survey subtracting what they did not vote then for various reasons). But the reality is that in 2017 those who voted for PSC with respect to the census were only 11%, that is, half of those who now say they voted for it then.