|
|
Today, many of these intellectuals have withdrawn to their academic work, others continue to participate in the public debate in the media, knowing that they run the risk of their ideas being simplified to the maximum. Enzo Traverso has written that after the fall of the really existing socialisms in 1989, with the fall of the Berlin wall, a “ left melancholy ” supervened . The case of the socialist intellectuals could not be further from this characterization if we circumscribe it to the 1980s. However, a decade later, the new configurations of the intellectual field, if we can still speak in those terms, brought them closer. more to the melancholy.
Science and religion were constituted in modernity as two opposing Belgium Phone Number List worldviews. The rational method against beliefs without a scientific basis, reason against faith, were opposing sides that were consolidated in the 19th century and whose controversies spanned the 20th century. What remains of these old cleavages in the 2020 pandemic, which has come to plunge us into even more uncertain worlds? How do religious institutions think about health and well-being? What are the channels of communication between churches and state? Health, science and beliefs in times of pandemic.

If we were to look at an old epistemology manual from the beginning of the 20th century , we would read that science and religion are two ways of understanding the world, two worldviews that see reality from opposite positions. This perspective recognizes its origin in social theories of differentiation. The spheres of human action (economic, political, aesthetic, erotic, intellectual, religious) are separated, function according to their own rules and definitions of authority, and are traversed by internal rationalization processese.
|
|